When to Replace SFMC, & When to Fix Your Implementation?

Written By Abhinav Gupta
When to Replace SFMC, And When to Fix Your Implementation First.jpg

Enterprise marketing teams evaluating Salesforce Marketing Cloud alternatives face a critical question most vendor comparisons skip: Is the platform actually the problem?

After supporting dozens of Salesforce implementations, one pattern stands out: teams often blame the platform for implementation failures. The result: expensive migrations that recreate the same problems on a new stack.

Before evaluating alternatives, this framework helps determine whether the situation calls for a platform switch or an implementation fix.

The quick assessment: The right path depends on three factors: integration depth with Salesforce, team capacity to operate the platform, and whether current problems stem from the platform itself or how it was configured.

What Should You Ask Before Blaming the Platform?

Before comparing alternatives, audit the current integration state. Deep Salesforce dependencies multiply migration complexity exponentially.

Integration Indicator If Present Migration Impact
Apex triggers firing transactional sends Deep integration 3-6 month migration window
Salesforce Custom Objects driving Journeys Data architecture dependency Data model redesign required
Service Cloud case triggers Cross-cloud dependency Workflow reconstruction needed
Data Cloud segments in journeys CDP layer involved Significant data pipeline work
Flow-triggered emails Automation dependency Re-architecture of automation layer
SFCC transactional messaging integration Commerce ecosystem lock-in Catalog, cart, order pipelines require rebuild

If three or more indicators apply (and they often do), migration complexity justifies a serious implementation audit before platform evaluation.

Decision criteria by team profile

Team Type Priority Platform Direction
Marketing-led, no dedicated admin Ease of use HubSpot, Klaviyo
IT-supported, technical capacity Power + flexibility Braze, Iterable
Agency-managed Partner expertise alignment Depends on agency stack
Enterprise with Salesforce investment Ecosystem continuity Improve SFMC or Adobe

Who to blame? SFMC Platform or the Implementation?

Before committing to migration, distinguish between implementation gaps and genuine platform misalignment. The symptoms often look similar; the solutions are vastly different.

Signs the implementation is the problem:

  • Journey Builder capabilities exist but aren't configured

  • AMPscript/SSJS (SFMC's personalization scripting languages) unused despite personalization requirements

  • Data extensions poorly structured with no relational data model

  • No dedicated SFMC administrator or ongoing training investment

  • SI partner disengaged after initial deployment

  • Basic batch campaigns running on enterprise-tier licensing

Signs the platform is genuinely misaligned:

  • Real-time personalization requires significant configuration effort; out-of-box defaults favor batch operations

  • Consumption pricing creates persistent budget unpredictability at current scale

  • Integration requirements exceed platform connector capabilities

  • Team will realistically never have technical capacity for SFMC complexity (and that's okay)

  • Use case is e-commerce/DTC where real-time product triggers are critical

Symptom Likely Root Cause Recommended Action
Low journey engagement rates Implementation gap Configuration audit + retraining
Abandoned cart triggers delayed >1hr Configuration or architecture Audit entry source setup; consider real-time platforms if unfixable
Budget overruns every quarter Consumption model fit Evaluate fixed-price alternatives
Marketing team avoids the platform Complexity mismatch Simplification or platform change
Only using batch email sends Underutilization Enablement before migration

If implementation gaps are primary, migration often recreates the same problems on a new platform. Investment in proper SFMC enablement may deliver better ROI than switching costs. Understanding common implementation challenges helps distinguish between platform limitations and configuration issues.

Which Alternative Fits Your Enterprise Profile?

Based on the assessment above, here's how alternatives map to enterprise scenarios:

Your Profile Primary Option Alternative Key Trade-off
E-commerce (Shopify, BigCommerce) Klaviyo Braze Less enterprise customization
E-commerce on SFCC Audit SFMC first Klaviyo (with rebuild) High integration complexity
Deep Salesforce, must stay in ecosystem Improve SFMC implementation Adobe Marketing Cloud Similar complexity profile
Mid-market, marketing-led team HubSpot Marketing Hub Mailchimp (simpler) Feature ceiling at enterprise scale
Mid-market with Salesforce CRM Marketing Cloud Growth HubSpot (with integration) Growth edition still maturing
Technical team, mobile-first Braze Iterable Higher implementation investment
B2B complex nurture journeys HubSpot or improved SFMC Marketo Different ecosystem dependencies

E-commerce & DTC Path

Klaviyo dominates this segment for good reason: native e-commerce integrations, real-time behavioral triggers, and predictable pricing. For Shopify-based operations, the migration path is well established. With 183,000+ customers and $1.2 billion in ARR, Klaviyo's scale is proven.

Trade-off: less enterprise customization and a different data model than Salesforce structures.

SFCC consideration: For organizations on Salesforce Commerce Cloud, the integration work is substantial. Commerce events and product data flows (catalog, inventory, carts, orders) require rebuilding. If abandoned cart and back-in-stock logic depends on SFCC jobs, custom code, or OCAPI/SCAPI (Commerce Cloud's REST APIs), budget real engineering time for migration.

Enterprise Salesforce Path

For organizations with deep Salesforce integration (custom objects in journeys, Apex triggers, Service Cloud workflows), the calculus changes. Organizations running SFCC + SFMC face the most complex migration scenario: the integration layer ties together data sync jobs (catalog, customer, order feeds), transactional email hooks, and the data extensions that power Journey Builder segmentation. Rebuilding these integrations on a new platform requires significant custom development. This is often the "audit implementation first" situation.

Why the integration complexity exists: Both SFCC and SFMC are acquired products running on separate architectures. SFMC originated as ExactTarget (acquired 2013 for $2.5B), which itself had acquired Pardot in 2012. SFCC was Demandware (acquired 2016 for $2.8B). The connector bridges two platforms that were never designed as one system.

Salesforce's consolidation play: Marketing Cloud Growth (launched 2024) is the first native marketing product built on the core Salesforce platform with Data Cloud. The company estimates 3-5 years to fully unify marketing products onto one platform. For organizations deep in the ecosystem, waiting for consolidation may be more practical than migrating away.

Adobe Marketing Cloud offers enterprise-grade capabilities with similar complexity profiles. Adobe's commerce stack may appeal to organizations wanting unified commerce + marketing from a single vendor.

However, if integration debt is high, evaluate whether better SFMC implementation addresses root issues before committing to 3-6 month migration projects.

Salesforce declined to participate in Forrester's Wave Q3 2024 evaluation, which is notable, but it doesn't mean the alternatives are easier to run.

Mid-Market Path

HubSpot Marketing Hub leads for marketing-led teams prioritizing ease of adoption. Strong native CRM, intuitive interface, teams can operate without dedicated technical support. For a detailed comparison between SFMC and HubSpot, the trade-offs depend heavily on technical capacity and journey complexity requirements.

Braze offers modern architecture and real-time capabilities. A Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for three consecutive years, Braze counts McDonald's and five Walt Disney divisions among its enterprise customers. Trade-off: higher implementation investment, typically $60K-$200K/year for mid-market, and a steeper learning curve.

For mid-market already on Salesforce CRM: Consider Marketing Cloud Growth Edition before adding another vendor. At $1,500/org/month (vs HubSpot Enterprise at $3,600/month), Growth offers native Data Cloud integration and AI capabilities (Agentforce, Einstein) without maintaining a separate system. The product is built on the core Salesforce platform, not the acquired ExactTarget architecture, so it shares data natively with Sales and Service Cloud.

What Does Migration Actually Cost?

Platform license represents 60-70% of Year 1 investment for most enterprise deployments. The remainder, often underestimated in vendor conversations, includes:

Cost Category % of Year 1 Enterprise Range (USD)
Platform license 60-70% $50,000 - $200,000+
SI partner / implementation 15-25% $20,000 - $100,000+
Data migration & cleanup 5-10% $10,000 - $40,000
Training & enablement 3-5% $5,000 - $20,000
Parallel operation period 5-10% 2-4 months dual licensing

Planning guidance:

  • Request Year 1 TCO estimates including implementation from every vendor under consideration. Resistance to providing estimates signals potential issues. For context on Salesforce implementation cost factors, enterprise deployments typically range from $50,000 to $180,000.

  • Factor SI partner selection as carefully as platform selection. Implementation quality often determines outcomes more than platform capabilities.

  • Budget for parallel operation. Running both platforms during migration is standard practice for enterprise deployments. Plan for 2-4 months of dual costs.

  • Account for productivity dip. Team learning curves affect campaign velocity for 2-3 months post-migration.

The talent cost factor most comparisons ignore

Platform licensing is visible; talent costs are where TCO calculations fall apart. SFMC typically requires dedicated technical staff who understand data extensions, AMPscript, Journey Builder architecture, and SQL for segmentation. These roles are specialized and command premium compensation.

Platform Typical Admin Role US Salary Range Staffing Model
SFMC Marketing Cloud Administrator $90K-$140K Dedicated FTE required
HubSpot HubSpot Admin $35K-$60K Often absorbed into Marketing Ops
Klaviyo Email Marketing Specialist $50K-$75K Marketing generalist can manage
Braze Marketing Automation Specialist $70K-$120K Technical capacity needed

Talent sourcing options: Offshore partners (India) deliver 40-60% cost savings with deep Salesforce talent pools, strong English proficiency, and proven delivery models for end-to-end implementations. Though, choose a partner, who is not just a team of executors, but who knows how to implement enterprise projects.

Nearshore (Latin America) offers 30-70% savings with timezone overlap. Onshore commands full rates but simplifies coordination.

Pricing comparison for planning:

  • SFMC: Starter Suite at $25/user/month, Growth at $1,500/org/month, Advanced at $3,250/org/month. Full Marketing Cloud Engagement starts at $1,250/org/month and scales with consumption.

  • HubSpot Marketing Hub: Professional at $890/month, Enterprise at $3,600/month.

  • Klaviyo: Free up to 250 profiles, scaling to ~$1,200/month at 100K profiles.

  • Braze/Iterable: Enterprise pricing typically $60K-$200K/year.

Actual pricing varies by region and agreement terms. Contact your respective Account Executive for current rates.

Comparison method: Pick three scenarios (50K, 250K, 1M contacts) with the same channel mix. Request pricing for all three from every vendor under consideration. This reveals how steeply each platform scales with growth.

Before switching platforms:

SFMC's lower tiers are more accessible than many realize. Organizations on higher-tier contracts with low utilization should evaluate downgrading within Salesforce before committing to migration costs.

The comparison that matters is complete Year 1 TCO, not list price vs list price.

How Long Does Migration Really Take?

Migration timelines vary dramatically based on integration complexity and organizational readiness.

Timeline ranges

  • Simple (contact lists, basic campaigns, minimal integrations): 2-4 weeks

  • Moderate (journey reconstruction, standard integrations): 1-2 months

  • Complex (custom objects, cross-cloud dependencies, multiple business units): 3-6 months

Industry benchmark: 47% of CRM migration projects miss initial timeline and budget targets. Enterprise marketing platform migrations follow similar patterns.

Hidden timeline factors

  • Data architecture reconciliation: Salesforce data models don't map cleanly to other platforms. Plan for schema design and data transformation work.

  • Journey reconstruction: Automations can't be exported and imported. Each journey requires manual rebuilding and testing.

  • Stakeholder alignment: Multiple business units typically require separate migration phases.

  • Parallel validation: Running both platforms simultaneously to validate data integrity and campaign performance.

One reference point: Meriton Suites migrated 1M+ contacts from SFMC to Klaviyo and reported improved engagement post-migration, but that required proper planning and integration work with their booking platform.

For enterprise migrations, the realistic planning multiplier is 2x initial timeline estimates and 1.5x initial budget projections.

The Bottom Line

E-commerce with real-time needs: Klaviyo provides the clearest migration path and strongest platform fit for product-triggered journeys and predictable pricing.

Enterprise with deep Salesforce integration: Audit implementation quality before committing to platform migration. The problem may be solvable without switching costs. Sometimes the answer is better configuration and enablement, not a new platform.

Mid-market seeking simplicity: HubSpot. Seeking technical power with modern architecture: Braze.

Migration reality: Plan for 2x the timeline and 1.5x the budget versus initial estimates. Factor SI partner costs as heavily as platform costs.

For organizations evaluating SFMC alternatives or assessing current implementation quality, contact us to discuss your specific situation.

Still unsure about fix or switch SFMC?

Lets talk.

Abhinav Gupta

1st Indian Salesforce MVP, rewarded 8 times in a row, has been blogging about Salesforce, Cloud, AI, & Web3 since 2011.

Founded India’s 1st Salesforce Dreamin event in India, called “Jaipur Dev Fest”. A seasoned speaker at Dreamforce, Dreamin events, & local meets. Author of many popular GitHub repos featured in official Salesforce blogs, newsletters, and books.

Next

The Era of Salesforce Agentforce 360